Understanding a pattern

I am wanting to knit a crescent shaped shawl, and am in the process of looking at patterns. I thought it would be a good opportunity for me to also learn more about short rows. I’m looking at patterns, trying to understand the construction at least somewhat before I choose my pattern. This one, the Friseur Fringe Shawl, I am assuming begins with the fringes, and the body of the shawl is shaped using short rows. Am I correct in my thinking?

Another thing I am not understanding is that there are no wrap and turn instructions. I’m assuming there will be holes at the turning points, I copied and magnified a portion of the shawl, but wasn’t able to see any holes. Is there something about the construction of this particular shawl that would keep holes from being made or am I just not seeing them?

Thank you in advance.

I’m looking at patterns, trying to understand the construction at least somewhat before I choose my pattern. This one, the Friseur Fringe Shawl, I am assuming begins with the fringes, and the body of the shawl is shaped using short rows. Am I correct in my thinking?

You are correct. Not all “crescent shaped” shawls are made this way, though. In fact, I would call this more of a “banana-shaped” shawl (smaller/narrower) than a “crescent shaped” (larger/worked from neck) shawl.

Another thing I am not understanding is that there are no wrap and turn instructions. I’m assuming there will be holes at the turning points, I copied and magnified a portion of the shawl, but wasn’t able to see any holes. Is there something about the construction of this particular shawl that would keep holes from being made or am I just not seeing them?

Many short-row patterns won’t specify what short-row technique to use (wrap and turn, turn and YO, German short-rows). The pattern assumes that you, the knitter, will use your preferred method.

So, in this case the intructions are ‘to work to the last 2 sts and turn.’ How you turn is up to you.

Very pretty shawl Claire! :heart:

You’ve got it! :thumbsup:

If I get W & T correctly, it’s used to close holes when you don’t want them like in socks. It’s not an absolute that you have to do it.

The short rows here will pull the ends of your shawl into a crescent shape, and I think the 39 remaining sts are in the middle of the shawl.

ETA: it looks like there are smallish holes along the long edge, they go nicely with the large stitches in the edging.

Oh Claire, that’s very pretty and looks like a fun knit. It was easier for me to zoom in on this link.
http://www.yarnspirations.com/pattern/knitting/friseur-fringe-shawl
You can see the tiny holes particularly at the model’s right shoulder, just as JPC mentioned. I like them too, but you could close them up if you’d prefer.

I purchased a magazine five years ago because of this pattern,
Ruffled Shawl, and have periodically pulled out the magazine and looked at it, clueless about the construction. :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: I still don’t completely comprehend the instructions, but I’m going to take the leap, and as Ingrid says ‘trust the pattern’.

The project includes a technique for hiding the wraps: ‘Hide the wraps by working them together with the stitches that have been wrapped. Work to wrapped stitch; insert needle under wrap and knitwise into wrapped stitch; knit wrap and stitch together as one.’

Is anyone familiar with this technique?

That’s typical for working short rows with wrapped stitches. Most any video you find on youtube for W&T will show that sometimes with a minor variation. Some will show lifting the wrap onto the needle first. I’m sort of on short-row strike right now :mrgreen: so I’ll let you search out videos. You might like ones other than what I’d pick anyhow. There are videos specific to short rows for ruffles too. I think Amy has a video showing how to pick up the wraps, maybe a sock heel how to.

ETA I forgot to say what a pretty shawl that is.

Yes,working the wrap and wrapped stitch together helps close up holes, just don’t pull the stitch too tightly.

Sometimes it can be hard to trust the pattern, but when you do, the :figureditout: is almost inescapable. :heart: